12m 4s
March 31, 2021
3,241 views
Afraid of this giantess? I am just a normal person."
While that comment may have seemed out-of-the-way to many the way the story broke last week we were given little to no information to help determine who is responsible. The next stage is to see if the story can be re-worked.
We have no idea how much that story cost and many other facts about this case could have turned up in an independent investigation. We can only imagine the cost of it taking a few months and being completely ignorant of all, not just the accused, to get there. But the possibility is that the perpetrator will eventually face trials and receive a jury.
The court has the power to make the jury have a final say in the verdict and it is up to the jury to decide. This case is no different.
It is not likely that if the jury had seen the video taken by the victim and the accused, they would have found there was insufficient evidence to convict. But if it had done so, and the jury accepted it and found there was sufficient evidence to convict, the case would be a slam dunk. The evidence would have been dismissed even if it hadn't been made public.
In this case only the accused was convicted, however, and it is only a matter of time before they are put to trial – a trial that could take decades and potentially even decades longer.
The question is, how long, should it